![]() |
|||||||
Teaching |
|||||||
Click here for Undergraduate Courses. Teaching stands at the heart of my job. Whether it is through my writing or lecturing, my job is to communicate ideas that in one way or another, directly or indirectly, by enriching or provoking, contribute to the continuing intellectual growth of my audience. My own teachers (my parents foremost among them) conveyed to me not simply a love a learning, but also its joy; the incredible excitement and rush that accompanies a new idea, however silly I may ultimately come to think it was. It is this freedom of mind – the curiosity and disposition that allows one to think unconventionally; the skills that allow ideas to take shape, and that then refine them; and the knowledge out of which these ideas are made – that I want to convey to my own students. In this way I am coming to see myself as more of a facilitator than a teacher h different strengths and challenges and pressing issues, and few pleasures are as sweet for me as helping an individual to discover his or her own intellectual path, and continue the journey. I primarily teach three constituencies, undergraduates, graduates, and adults. Each, generally speaking, has different needs. My teaching of undergraduates is weighted toward critical skill development: How do you make and critique arguments? How can you communicate them effectively? How do you productively engage an idea or a set of facts? For graduate students, the weight shifts toward developing the skills necessary for the production of specialized knowledge. At this level I train students for a professional life studying the Jews of antiquity. For adults, many of whom have active and demanding professional lives, the need more often is for knowledge that is more immediate, immediately applicable, and provocative. Teaching Principles My approach to undergraduate teaching continues to evolve, but is grounded in three core convictions: I believe in the value of a liberal education. Much of life is about learning to ask and grapple with the right questions, even while admitting that the answers are sometimes elusive. Learning to ask those questions and to find frameworks for answering them, though, is an acquired skill. In all of my courses I seek to develop and strengthen the critical thinking and reasoning skills that are essential for a full and informed life. A liberal education provides more than marketable skills, although it certainly does that. (I like to tell my students that after graduating from college with my BA in ancient Jewish history I took my first job at an investment bank on Wall St. before returning to graduate school; this is the one factoid about me that they consistently remember.) It develops habits of mind that lead to personal freedom and pleasure. I still receive a sense of subversive delight when questioning a conventional understanding and experience the joy of a new idea. Almost nothing is professionally more satisfying to me than watching as a student experiences the same pleasures. I believe that learning is best done actively rather than passively. Education is not about the delivery and memorization of data, although knowledge of course content is surely important. It is about knowing what to do with that stuff. I have known for a long time about the large body of educational research that indicates that active engagement and practice is far more pedagogically effective than lectures. While I have always encouraged discussions and assigned much written work (I often require a short paper each week) in order to foster such engagement, Derek Bok’s Our Underachieving Colleges galvanized me. I have been increasing my efforts to move away from lecturing in order to achieve better learning outcomes. I believe that education is a relationship, not a transaction. The classroom is a dynamic environment in which human beings engage each other. My goal in the classroom is to set up a safe learning environment that challenges each of us to further our human potential. Selected Undergraduate Courses Judaism A problem of definition lies at the heart of this course. What is “Judaism”? How can a definition of “Judaism” be inclusive enough to include the black-caftanned Lubavitch Hasidim of Brooklyn, the Reform Jews of Israel, religious Zionists and anti-Zionists, and American Reconstructionist Jews who have replaced many references to a male God with references to a female One? Might it be more accurate to talk of “Judaisms,” or are there in fact characteristics that hold these different Jewish communities together into a single coherent group? In addition to the definitional problem there is an analytical one. It is not enough to describe a religious system; as students of religion we also seek to explain it. One goal of this course is to introduce you to the academic study of religion. Each discipline has “good” and “bad” questions: Within the context of the academic study of Judaism (or indeed, any religion), what are the “good” questions, and what are the methods for trying to answer them? A sample syllabus can be found here. The Beginnings of Judaism A little over a century later a “remnant” of this people returned to Jerusalem, this time as Jews. Now bringing a book they called the Torah, they began to construct a religion fundamentally different from that of their Israelite ancestors. This course is the story of how the religion of ancient Israel was transformed into Judaism. Our story starts with the building of the Second Temple and ends about 1,000 years later, with the flourishing of the rabbinic movement and the creation of the patterns of thought and rituals that have lasted to the present day. A sample syllabus can be found here. Talmud In this course, we will survey the literary legacy of the rabbis with a focus on the Talmud. There are four primary goals of the class:
Judaism and Christianity in Conflict Please note what this class is not. We will not actually engage in polemic: this is an academic study of dialogue rather than the dialogue itself. Nor is this course an exploration of how Jews and Christians do and can get along. While we will occasionally come across some attempts at reconciliation, this course is an exploration of the dark side of the relationship. Note also that from whatever background you come from, it is likely that some of the material presented in this course will offend you. You might feel attacked or embarrassed at times by the violence of the language and its assault on your own faith commitments. While I want you to take this material seriously, and to allow yourself to be challenged by it, I am also sensitive to the fact that these challenges could hinder your ability to learn. If you find material particularly disturbing, please do not hesitate to talk to me. A sample syllabus can be found here. Jewish Mysticism Religion in the Dead Sea Scrolls The Mishnah Orthodoxy and Heresy in the Ancient World This class will also serve to develop and strengthen technical and critical skills for the analysis of ancient Jewish literature, particularly rabbinic texts. You will be expected to prepare Hebrew and Aramaic texts in the original for most classes, and we will devote part of most classes to reading and translating them. Syllabus can be found here. Philo This goal of this graduate seminar is to introduce you to Philo and his contemporary, academic study. By the end of this class you will have read most of Philo’s surviving literary works and be conversant with most of the pressing academic issues that they raise. Syllabus can be found here.
|
|||||||
Teaching |
|||||||